Sample report · directly from the PDF
Nature, forest, trees and heritage
Original text and a real figure from the GrundCheck sample chapter Nature, forest, trees and heritage, including the sources, data dates and limitations carried by the delivered PDF.
Readable in full, not retold
The text below is read on every request from the same chapter PDF offered here for download. Sources, data dates, limitations and empty results therefore remain verbatim.
The figure comes from PDF page 1. The complete text of every page follows below.
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 1/22
7.1 Nature, forest, trees and heritage protection Parcel scope: Flurstück 16/24, area 627 m². The review checked Forest and wooded areas nearby, Protected and nature areas nearby, Natural monuments nearby using 11 sources listed in the appendix ledger, retrieved on 27 September 2026. The main result for this parcel is: Nature conservation area: No published designation covers the report point. Before committing to the purchase, request Dated nature-conservation response on “Nature conservation areas (BfN)”. SOURCE OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0); Copernicus HRL Tree Cover Density 2018 (EEA, 10 m) and 9 more (Appendix A.1) METHOD public-data GIS query and screening AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY Chapter findings summarised; each finding states its spatial relationship on its own evidence page FIG. 7.1 — Nature, forest, trees and heritage protection OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0); Copernicus HRL Tree Cover Density 2018 (EEA, 10 m) and 9 more (Appendix A.1). Analyst read FINDING: The review established: Landscape protection area: The nearest WMS-resolved boundary lies 159 m northwest; the report point is outside it. CONSEQUENCE: The source position is supported by 11 of 11 responses; no query remains open. For the buyer, this point should be resolved before agreeing price or purchase. NEXT ACTION: ask competent nature-conservation authority for dated nature-conservation response on “Nature conservation areas (BfN)”. https://grund-check.de 80 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 2/22
7.2 Questions and evidence on nature, forest and heritage Give the mapped “Nature conservation areas (BfN)” finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. Meaning for the purchase: Official screen; the responsible nature authority confirms designation and conditions. Evidence status: Nature conservation area: No published designation covers the report point; Evidence requested: Dated nature-conservation response on “Nature conservation areas (BfN)”; Office: competent nature-conservation authority. SOURCE OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0) METHOD public-data GIS query and screening AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY Questions for the competent authorities; they concern the selected parcel and measure nothing themselves FIG. 7.2 — Questions and evidence on nature, forest and heritage OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0). Analyst read FINDING: Nature conservation area: No published designation covers the report point. CONSEQUENCE: The nearest visible boundary begins 2.5 km north, with its WMS shape and the parcel retained in one frame; for “Nature conservation area”, a confirmed response from competent nature-conservation authority is carried into the purchase review; a qualified, conflicting or absent response leaves that finding unresolved. Meaning for the purchase: Official screen; the responsible nature authority confirms designation and conditions. When you query a finding, quote the source and its retrieval date from that list. https://grund-check.de 81 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 3/22
7.1–7.2 · CHECKS, EVIDENCE AND NEXT STEPS 7.1 Nature, forest, trees and heritage protection Source: OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0); Copernicus HRL Tree Cover Density 2018 (EEA, 10 m) and 9 more (Appendix A.1) · As at 27 September 2026 7.2 Questions and evidence on nature, forest and heritage Source: OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0) · As at 27 September 2026 Nature conservation area — No published designation covers the report point. The nearest visible boundary begins 2.5 km north, with its WMS shape and the parcel retained in one frame. CLEAR · Landscape protection area — The nearest WMS-resolved boundary lies 159 m northwest; the report point is outside it. CLEAR · Habitats site (Natura 2000) — A published Natura 2000 boundary begins 1.9 km northeast. The parcel is outside it, and both geometries are shown together. Tree canopy lies within 25 m of the report point and covers 19.8% of the approximately 4453 m-wide map window — Give the mapped “Tree-cover density (Copernicus HRL)” finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. Meaning for the purchase: Physical land-cover context, not a legal designation. The satellite classification detects sealed surface within 25 m of the report point and across 30.3% of the displayed surroundings — Give the mapped “Imperviousness density (Copernicus HRL)” finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. Meaning for the purchase: Physical land-cover context, not a legal designation. Before committing to the purchase, request Dated land-cover response for the parcel on “Imperviousness density (Copernicus HRL)” from competent environmental or specialist authority. Dated nature-conservation response on “Nature conservation areas (BfN)” — competent nature-conservation authority · Give the mapped “Nature conservation areas (BfN)” finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. Meaning for the purchase: Official screen; the responsible nature authority confirms designation and conditions. Dated nature-conservation response on “Landscape protection areas (BfN)” — competent nature-conservation authority · Give the mapped “Landscape protection areas (BfN)” finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. Meaning for the purchase: Official screen; the responsible nature authority confirms designation and conditions. Dated nature-conservation response on “Habitats Directive sites, Natura 2000 (BfN)” — competent nature-conservation authority · Give the mapped “Habitats Directive sites, Natura 2000 (BfN)” finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. Meaning for the purchase: Official screen; the responsible nature authority confirms designation and conditions. Dated forestry-authority response on “Tree-cover density (Copernicus HRL)” — competent forestry or nature-conservation authority · Give the mapped “Tree-cover density (Copernicus HRL)” finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. Meaning for the purchase: Physical land- cover context, not a legal designation. Appendix source ledger — The 11 sources behind chapter 07 are listed there one by one. When you query a finding, quote the source and its retrieval date from that list. https://grund-check.de 82 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 4/22
7.3 Forest and wooded areas nearby Nearest OSM-mapped feature: forest; it lies 379 m from the parcel boundary. The 1800 m search of the OSM extract returned 8 active feature(s). The largest mapped classes are forest: 7 objects and wooded area: 1 object. SOURCE OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0) METHOD Tag search of the Geofabrik extract within 1800 m; nearest returned geometry measured to the mapped parcel outline; Community- mapped inventory count, no statutory threshold. AS AT 22 September 2026 GEOMETRY Distance is to the mapped parcel outline, not to a surveyed legal boundary FIG. 7.3 — Forest and wooded areas nearby OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0). 379 m Nearest mapped feature Analyst read FINDING: Community-mapped tree cover context, not the statutory forest-setback check a Land forest authority answers. CONSEQUENCE: No state forest-authority register; not a statutory setback reading. NEXT ACTION: Ask the authority responsible about requirements relevant to the project. Give the mapped finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. https://grund-check.de 83 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 5/22
7.4 Protected and nature areas nearby Nearest OSM-mapped feature: Twedter Feld · nature reserve; it lies 2479 m from the parcel boundary. The 2500 m search of the OSM extract returned 1 active feature(s). The mapped total comprises nature reserve: 1 object. SOURCE OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0) METHOD Tag search of the Geofabrik extract within 2500 m; nearest returned geometry measured to the mapped parcel outline; Community- mapped inventory count, no statutory threshold. AS AT 22 September 2026 GEOMETRY Distance is to the mapped parcel outline, not to a surveyed legal boundary FIG. 7.4 — Protected and nature areas nearby OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0). 2,479 m Nearest mapped feature Twedter Feld · nature reserve Analyst read FINDING: Community-mapped context only; a designation boundary must be confirmed against the official register before it is relied on. CONSEQUENCE: No official Natura 2000/Naturschutzgebiet register read; see the planning chapter for that. NEXT ACTION: Ask the authority responsible about requirements relevant to the project. Give the mapped finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. https://grund-check.de 84 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 6/22
7.5 Natural monuments The OSM search found 1 active natural-monument objects within 2500 m (1 × natural-monument tree). The nearest is natural-monument tree, 2269 m from the report point. This is community mapping, not an official natural-monument register. SOURCE OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0) METHOD Tag search of the Geofabrik extract within 2500 m; nearest returned geometry measured to the mapped parcel outline; Community- mapped inventory count, no statutory threshold. AS AT 22 September 2026 GEOMETRY Distance is to the mapped parcel outline, not to a surveyed legal boundary FIG. 7.5 — Natural monuments OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0). 2,269 m Nearest object natural-monument tree Analyst read FINDING: Objects by OSM type: 1. CONSEQUENCE: A protected natural monument nearby can carry its own building restriction; confirm with the lower nature authority. Give the mapped finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. LIMIT: An OSM entry does not replace confirmation by the lower nature authority. No official Naturdenkmal register read. https://grund-check.de 85 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 7/22
7.3–7.5 · CHECKS, EVIDENCE AND NEXT STEPS 7.3 Forest and wooded areas nearby Source: OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0) · As at 22 September 2026 7.4 Protected and nature areas nearby Source: OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0) · As at 22 September 2026 7.5 Natural monuments Source: OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0) · As at 22 September 2026 CLEAR · Nearest mapped feature — forest · 379 m CONSEQUENCE — Measured from the mapped parcel outline to OSM geometry (way 167235111). Active mapped features — 8 NEXT ACTION — Ask the authority responsible for “Forest and wooded areas” about requirements relevant to the project. Evidence limit — No state forest-authority register; not a statutory setback reading. CONSEQUENCE — To be answered in writing by: competent forestry or nature-conservation authority. Action — Request before committing to the purchase: Dated forestry-authority response on “Forest and wooded areas nearby”. Body: competent forestry or nature-conservation authority. CONSEQUENCE — Pause the purchase if: the forestry authority records the parcel, or part of it, as forest. Reading — OpenStreetMap extract (Geofabrik, data as of 22 September 2026), read on 27 September 2026, radius 1800 m CLEAR · Nearest mapped feature — Twedter Feld · nature reserve · 2479 m CONSEQUENCE — Measured from the mapped parcel outline to OSM geometry (way 330733567). Active mapped features — 1 NEXT ACTION — Ask the authority responsible for “Protected and nature areas” about requirements relevant to the project. UNRESOLVED · Evidence limit — No official Natura 2000/Naturschutzgebiet register read; see the planning chapter for that. CONSEQUENCE — To be answered in writing by: competent nature-conservation authority. Action — Request before committing to the purchase: Dated nature-conservation response on “Protected and nature areas nearby”. Body: competent nature-conservation authority. CONSEQUENCE — Pause the purchase if: the nature authority names a designation boundary or condition at the parcel that the read map image does not show. Reading — OpenStreetMap extract (Geofabrik, data as of 22 September 2026), read on 27 September 2026, radius 2500 m CLEAR · Nearest object — natural-monument tree · 2269 m CONSEQUENCE — Measured from the mapped parcel outline to OSM geometry (node 9352935536). CLEAR · Objects by OSM type — 1 CONSEQUENCE — 1 × natural-monument tree https://grund-check.de 86 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 8/22
7.6 Water features nearby Nearest OSM-mapped feature: ditch; it lies 104 m from the parcel boundary. The 1800 m search of the OSM extract returned 83 active feature(s). The largest mapped classes are water body: 45 objects, stream: 21 objects and ditch: 13 objects, with a further 4 objects across 1 further class. SOURCE OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0) METHOD Tag search of the Geofabrik extract within 1800 m; nearest returned geometry measured to the mapped parcel outline; Community- mapped inventory count, no statutory threshold. AS AT 22 September 2026 GEOMETRY Distance is to the mapped parcel outline, not to a surveyed legal boundary FIG. 7.6 — Water features nearby OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0). 104 m Nearest mapped feature Analyst read FINDING: Nearby mapped water can mean a statutory waterside setback; confirm with the lower water authority. CONSEQUENCE: No official water-body register or flood-hazard reading; see the hazards chapter for that. NEXT ACTION: Ask the authority responsible about requirements relevant to the project. Give the mapped finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. https://grund-check.de 87 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 9/22
7.7 Tree-cover density (Copernicus HRL) Tree canopy lies within 25 m of the report point and covers 19.8% of the approximately 4453 m-wide map window. Physical canopy cover, not forest status under Land law. SOURCE Copernicus HRL Tree Cover Density 2018 (EEA, 10 m) METHOD WMS image-pixel measurement across the map window and within 25 m of the report point AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY Raster class present within 25 m of the report point FIG. 7.7 — Tree-cover density (Copernicus HRL) Copernicus HRL Tree Cover Density 2018 (EEA, 10 m). 19.8 % Canopy pixels across the full map Analyst read FINDING: Before fixing a building footprint, identify the actual trees on or beside the parcel and check any protection or removal requirements. CONSEQUENCE: Physical canopy cover, not forest status under Land law. Give the mapped finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case- specific requirement affects the parcel. https://grund-check.de 88 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 10/22
7.5–7.7 · CHECKS, EVIDENCE AND NEXT STEPS Natural monuments (continued) Source: OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0) · As at 22 September 2026 7.6 Water features nearby Source: OpenStreetMap contributors, Geofabrik extract (ODbL 1.0) · As at 22 September 2026 7.7 Tree-cover density (Copernicus HRL) Source: Copernicus HRL Tree Cover Density 2018 (EEA, 10 m) · As at 27 September 2026 UNRESOLVED · Evidence limit — No official Naturdenkmal register read. NEXT ACTION — A protected natural monument nearby can carry its own building restriction; confirm with the lower nature authority. Action — Request before committing to the purchase: Dated nature- conservation response on “Natural monuments nearby”. Body: competent nature-conservation authority. CONSEQUENCE — Pause the purchase if: the nature authority names a designation boundary or condition at the parcel that the read map image does not show. Reading — OpenStreetMap extract (Geofabrik, data as of 22 September 2026), read on 27 September 2026, radius 2500 m CLEAR · Nearest mapped feature — ditch · 104 m CONSEQUENCE — Measured from the mapped parcel outline to OSM geometry (way 164348737). Active mapped features — 83 NEXT ACTION — Ask the authority responsible for “Water features” about requirements relevant to the project. UNRESOLVED · Evidence limit — No official water-body register or flood-hazard reading; see the hazards chapter for that. CONSEQUENCE — To be answered in writing by: competent environmental or specialist authority. Action — Request before committing to the purchase: Dated water- law response on “Water features nearby”. Body: competent environmental or specialist authority. CONSEQUENCE — Pause the purchase if: the water authority confirms a different flood, protection or risk zone at the parcel from the one read here. Reading — OpenStreetMap extract (Geofabrik, data as of 22 September 2026), read on 27 September 2026, radius 1800 m Tree canopy within 25 m of the report point — Raster class present within 25 m of the report point CONSEQUENCE — The test is a disc of up to 25 m round the point, not a parcel average. CLEAR · Canopy pixels across the full map (not parcel) — 19.8% CONSEQUENCE — The denominator is every image pixel in the map window, not the parcel's area. CLEAR · Canopy raster / reference year — 10 m · 2018 CONSEQUENCE — Physical canopy cover, not forest status under Land law. Action — Request before committing to the purchase: Dated forestry-authority response on “Tree-cover density (Copernicus HRL)”. Body: competent forestry or nature- conservation authority. CONSEQUENCE — Pause the purchase if: the forestry authority records the parcel, or part of it, as forest. https://grund-check.de 89 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 11/22
7.8 Imperviousness density (Copernicus HRL) The satellite classification detects sealed surface within 25 m of the report point and across 30.3% of the displayed surroundings. Satellite-derived 2018 land cover, not a current drainage assessment. SOURCE Copernicus HRL Imperviousness Density 2018 (EEA, 10 m) METHOD WMS image-pixel measurement across the map window and within 25 m of the report point AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY Raster class present within 25 m of the report point FIG. 7.8 — Imperviousness density (Copernicus HRL) Copernicus HRL Imperviousness Density 2018 (EEA, 10 m). 30.3 % Sealed-surface pixels across the full map Analyst read FINDING: For the purchase, verify the parcel's actual surfacing, infiltration capacity and current drainage route. CONSEQUENCE: Satellite-derived 2018 land cover, not a current drainage assessment. Give the mapped finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. https://grund-check.de 90 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 12/22
7.9 CORINE Land Cover 2018 The EEA point query assigns the published CLC 2018 class to the report point. It describes landscape character, not statutory land use. SOURCE Corine Land Cover 2018 (EEA / Copernicus Land Monitoring Service) METHOD ArcGIS point identify AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY class polygon contains the report point FIG. 7.9 — CORINE Land Cover 2018 Corine Land Cover 2018 (EEA / Copernicus Land Monitoring Service). CLC 112 Discontinuous urban fabric Analyst read FINDING: CLC code 112 (Discontinuous urban fabric) is mapped in units of at least 25 ha; far coarser than a single parcel. CONSEQUENCE: Do not infer the parcel's actual buildings or vegetation from this class; use the cadastre, a site visit and finer-grained sources for those questions. For the purchase decision: Use as landscape context only. No development plan, ALKIS use or fine-scale vegetation survey. Give the mapped finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. https://grund-check.de 91 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 13/22
7.10 Nature conservation areas (BfN) Nature conservation area: No published designation covers the report point. The nearest visible boundary begins 2.5 km north, with its WMS shape and the parcel retained in one frame. SOURCE BfN Naturschutzgebiete METHOD WMS image-pixel measurement; map frame about 8.2 km, derived from the nearest genuine WMS- pixel coordinate and the print frame's aspect ratio AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY Nearest mapped area about 2.5 km from the report point FIG. 7.10 — Nature conservation areas (BfN) BfN Naturschutzgebiete. 2.5 km The nearest visible boundary Analyst read FINDING: Before treating that separation as clearance in the purchase decision, confirm the boundary and protection order against the parcel. CONSEQUENCE: For the purchase decision: Official screen; the responsible nature authority confirms designation and conditions. Nationwide register view; the designation instrument and Land authority control. Give the mapped finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. https://grund-check.de 92 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 14/22
7.8–7.10 · CHECKS, EVIDENCE AND NEXT STEPS 7.8 Imperviousness density (Copernicus HRL) Source: Copernicus HRL Imperviousness Density 2018 (EEA, 10 m) · As at 27 September 2026 7.9 CORINE Land Cover 2018 Source: Corine Land Cover 2018 (EEA / Copernicus Land Monitoring Service) · As at 27 September 2026 7.10 Nature conservation areas (BfN) Source: BfN Naturschutzgebiete · As at 27 September 2026 Sealed surface within 25 m of the report point — Raster class present within 25 m of the report point CONSEQUENCE — The test is a disc of up to 25 m round the point, not a parcel average. CLEAR · Sealed-surface pixels across the full map (not parcel) — 30.3% CONSEQUENCE — Uses the same map-window denominator defined on the preceding Copernicus page. CLEAR · Imperviousness raster / reference year — 10 m · 2018 CONSEQUENCE — Satellite-derived 2018 land cover, not a current drainage assessment. Action — Request before committing to the purchase: Dated land-cover response for the parcel on “Imperviousness density (Copernicus HRL)”. Body: competent environmental or specialist authority. CONSEQUENCE — Pause the purchase if: the written response classifies the area at the parcel differently from the grid image read here. CLEAR · CLC code at the report point — 112 CONSEQUENCE — Point-in-polygon query, not a parcel average. CLEAR · Land-cover class — Discontinuous urban fabric CONSEQUENCE — CLC describes land cover, not building rights. CLEAR · Minimum mapping unit — 25 ha CONSEQUENCE — Published mapping-definition threshold, not a parcel pass/fail test; small parcels may inherit the surrounding class. UNRESOLVED · Map key — Colour patch at the report point = CLC 112 CONSEQUENCE — The patch under the report point carries class 112 (Discontinuous urban fabric). The other colours in the map image are neighbouring classes this query did not read. Evidence limit — No development plan, ALKIS use or fine-scale vegetation survey. CONSEQUENCE — Use as landscape context only. Action — Request before committing to the purchase: Dated land-cover response for the parcel on “CORINE Land Cover 2018”. Body: competent environmental or specialist authority. CONSEQUENCE — Pause the purchase if: the written response classifies the area at the parcel differently from the grid image read here. Nature-conservation boundary at the report point — Nearest mapped area about 2.5 km from the report point CONSEQUENCE — Nationwide register view; the designation instrument and Land authority control. CLEAR · Register image for nature-conservation boundary — BfN Naturschutzgebiete CONSEQUENCE — BfN geoservice, not an on-site survey. The map frame reaches about 8.2 km around the report point so the parcel and the nearest published extent appear together. Action — Request before committing to the purchase: Dated nature- conservation response on “Nature conservation areas (BfN)”. Body: competent nature-conservation authority. CONSEQUENCE — Pause the purchase if: the nature authority names a designation boundary or condition at the parcel that the read map image does not show. https://grund-check.de 93 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 15/22
7.11 Landscape protection areas (BfN) Landscape protection area: The nearest WMS-resolved boundary lies 159 m northwest; the report point is outside it. SOURCE BfN Landschaftsschutzgebiete METHOD WMS image-pixel measurement; map frame about 5.0 km, derived from the nearest genuine WMS- pixel coordinate and the print frame's aspect ratio AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY Nearest mapped area about 159 m from the report point FIG. 7.11 — Landscape protection areas (BfN) BfN Landschaftsschutzgebiete. 159 m Landscape-protection status at the report point from the report point Analyst read FINDING: Before relying on this image distance, confirm the boundary against the parcel with the responsible authority. CONSEQUENCE: Official screen; the responsible nature authority confirms designation and conditions. The map shows designation extents, not the individual prohibitions in the protection order. Give the mapped finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. https://grund-check.de 94 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 16/22
7.12 Habitats Directive sites, Natura 2000 (BfN) Habitats site (Natura 2000): A published Natura 2000 boundary begins 1.9 km northeast. The parcel is outside it, and both geometries are shown together. SOURCE BfN FFH-Gebiete (Natura 2000) METHOD WMS image-pixel measurement; map frame about 5.5 km, derived from the nearest genuine WMS- pixel coordinate and the print frame's aspect ratio AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY Nearest mapped area about 1.9 km from the report point FIG. 7.12 — Habitats Directive sites, Natura 2000 (BfN) BfN FFH-Gebiete (Natura 2000). 1.9 km Habitats-site boundary Nearest mapped area from the report point Analyst read FINDING: Register image for habitats-site boundary: BfN FFH-Gebiete (Natura 2000). CONSEQUENCE: Official screen; the responsible nature authority confirms designation and conditions. Designation screen; no Habitats Regulations assessment is included. NEXT ACTION: Ask the nature authority whether access, drainage or construction calls for an effects screening. Give the mapped finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. https://grund-check.de 95 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 17/22
7.13 EU bird protection sites, Natura 2000 (BfN) EU bird protection site (Natura 2000): The parcel is outside the returned designation; its nearest WMS-visible edge lies 8.6 km northeast. SOURCE BfN EU-Vogelschutzgebiete (Natura 2000) METHOD WMS image-pixel measurement; map frame about 22.5 km, derived from the nearest genuine WMS- pixel coordinate and the print frame's aspect ratio AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY Nearest mapped area about 8.6 km from the report point FIG. 7.13 — EU bird protection sites, Natura 2000 (BfN) BfN EU-Vogelschutzgebiete (Natura 2000). 8.6 km Bird-protection boundary Nearest mapped area from the report point Analyst read FINDING: Before clearance or construction, establish whether a current species survey is required. CONSEQUENCE: Register image for bird-protection boundary: BfN EU-Vogelschutzgebiete (Natura 2000). Designation extent, not an on-site protected-species survey. https://grund-check.de 96 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 18/22
7.11–7.13 · CHECKS, EVIDENCE AND NEXT STEPS 7.11 Landscape protection areas (BfN) Source: BfN Landschaftsschutzgebiete · As at 27 September 2026 7.12 Habitats Directive sites, Natura 2000 (BfN) Source: BfN FFH-Gebiete (Natura 2000) · As at 27 September 2026 7.13 EU bird protection sites, Natura 2000 (BfN) Source: BfN EU-Vogelschutzgebiete (Natura 2000) · As at 27 September 2026 Landscape-protection status at the report point — Nearest mapped area about 159 m from the report point CONSEQUENCE — The map shows designation extents, not the individual prohibitions in the protection order. CLEAR · Register image for landscape-protection status — BfN Landschaftsschutzgebiete CONSEQUENCE — BfN geoservice, not an on-site survey. The map frame reaches about 5.0 km around the report point so the parcel and the nearest published extent appear together. Action — Request before committing to the purchase: Dated nature-conservation response on “Landscape protection areas (BfN)”. Body: competent nature-conservation authority. CONSEQUENCE — Pause the purchase if: the nature authority names a designation boundary or condition at the parcel that the read map image does not show. Habitats-site boundary at the report point — Nearest mapped area about 1.9 km from the report point CONSEQUENCE — Designation screen; no Habitats Regulations assessment is included. CLEAR · Register image for habitats-site boundary — BfN FFH-Gebiete (Natura 2000) CONSEQUENCE — BfN geoservice, not an on-site survey. The map frame reaches about 5.5 km around the report point so the parcel and the nearest published extent appear together. Action — Request before committing to the purchase: Dated nature-conservation response on “Habitats Directive sites, Natura 2000 (BfN)”. Body: competent nature- conservation authority. CONSEQUENCE — Pause the purchase if: the nature authority names a designation boundary or condition at the parcel that the read map image does not show. Bird-protection boundary at the report point — Nearest mapped area about 8.6 km from the report point CONSEQUENCE — Designation extent, not an on-site protected-species survey. CLEAR · Register image for bird-protection boundary — BfN EU-Vogelschutzgebiete (Natura 2000) CONSEQUENCE — BfN geoservice, not an on-site survey. The map frame reaches about 22.5 km around the report point so the parcel and the nearest published extent appear together. https://grund-check.de 97 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 19/22
7.14 Landscape type in the nationwide context (BfN) BfN places the report point in the landscape unit "Angeln, Schwansen und Dänischer Wohld", type "Ackergeprägte, offene Kulturlandschaft" (BfN code 4.2). This describes the natural setting around the parcel. No designation and no condition for the purchase follows from it. SOURCE BfN Landschaftstypen METHOD WMS image-pixel measurement; map frame about 5.0 km, derived from the nearest genuine WMS- pixel coordinate and the print frame's aspect ratio AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY Report point lies inside the mapped area FIG. 7.14 — Landscape type in the nationwide context (BfN) BfN Landschaftstypen. Analyst read FINDING: BfN classifies the report point as type "Ackergeprägte, offene Kulturlandschaft" in the landscape unit "Angeln, Schwansen und Dänischer Wohld". CONSEQUENCE: The classification describes the landscape and has no legal effect of its own; obtain a parcel-specific response from the lower nature authority before relying on landscape character for a purchase or building-height decision. Descriptive landscape classification with no independent legal effect. Give the mapped finding to the responsible body and obtain a written answer on whether an official boundary, classification or case-specific requirement affects the parcel. https://grund-check.de 98 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 20/22
7.15 Nature parks (BfN) Nature park: The nearest published extent begins 19.3 km southeast; the report point is outside it. The wider frame shows its actual WMS shape rather than only a distance arrow. SOURCE BfN Naturparke METHOD WMS image-pixel measurement; map frame about 58.7 km, derived from the nearest genuine WMS- pixel coordinate and the print frame's aspect ratio AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY Nearest mapped area about 19.3 km from the report point FIG. 7.15 — Nature parks (BfN) BfN Naturparke. 19.3 km Nature park: The nearest published extent Analyst read FINDING: Its purpose and detailed rules become an immediate purchase issue only if the parcel-specific official check contradicts that separation. CONSEQUENCE: Register image for nature-park outer boundary: BfN Naturparke. Large-area designation screen; purpose and individual requirements follow Land law and the nature-park instrument. https://grund-check.de 99 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 21/22
7.16 Large-area designations at nationwide distance (BfN) The nationwide BfN large-area designations are far from the report point: National park 42.8 km, Biosphere reserve 42.8 km and National natural monument 216.2 km. Checked on 27 September 2026; this is a measured negative, not a missing value. The map shows the nearest of them together with the parcel. SOURCE BfN Nationalparke METHOD WMS image-pixel measurement per layer AS AT 27 September 2026 GEOMETRY 42.8 km southwest FIG. 7.16 — Large-area designations at nationwide distance (BfN) BfN Nationalparke. 42.8 km National park · nearest published extent southwest Analyst read FINDING: No separation of this order creates an obligation on this parcel. CONSEQUENCE: The value of the check is that it happened: all three designations were queried and are demonstrably far away. If an official parcel-specific response does show proximity after all, read the core, buffer and transition zones separately. National natural monument · nearest published extent: 216.2 km southeast. LIMIT: No zoning and no individual provision from the applicable protection instrument. https://grund-check.de 100 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24
Nature, forest, trees and heritagePDF page 22/22
7.14–7.16 · CHECKS, EVIDENCE AND NEXT STEPS 7.14 Landscape type in the nationwide context (BfN) Source: BfN Landschaftstypen · As at 27 September 2026 7.15 Nature parks (BfN) Source: BfN Naturparke · As at 27 September 2026 7.16 Large-area designations at nationwide distance (BfN) Source: BfN Nationalparke · As at 27 September 2026 Landscape-class coverage at the report point — Report point lies inside the mapped area CONSEQUENCE — Descriptive landscape classification with no independent legal effect. Map key: the colour patch under the report point is the landscape type published there; the other tones in the image are neighbouring types whose names this image service does not return. CLEAR · Landscape type per BfN — Ackergeprägte, offene Kulturlandschaft (BfN code 4.2) CONSEQUENCE — Landscape unit "Angeln, Schwansen und Dänischer Wohld". Describes the natural setting; no designation follows from it. CLEAR · Register image for landscape-class coverage — BfN Landschaftstypen CONSEQUENCE — BfN geoservice, not an on-site survey. The map frame reaches about 5.0 km around the report point so the parcel and the nearest published extent appear together. Action — Request before committing to the purchase: Dated nature-conservation response on “Landscape type in the nationwide context (BfN)”. Body: competent nature- conservation authority. CONSEQUENCE — Pause the purchase if: the nature authority names a designation boundary or condition at the parcel that the read map image does not show. Nature-park outer boundary at the report point — Nearest mapped area about 19.3 km from the report point CONSEQUENCE — Large-area designation screen; purpose and individual requirements follow Land law and the nature-park instrument. CLEAR · Register image for nature-park outer boundary — BfN Naturparke CONSEQUENCE — BfN geoservice, not an on-site survey. The map frame reaches about 58.7 km around the report point so the parcel and the nearest published extent appear together. CLEAR · National park · nearest published extent — 42.8 km southwest CONSEQUENCE — Nationwide designation screen; the Land statute or protection order and its zoning are legally controlling. CLEAR · Biosphere reserve · nearest published extent — 42.8 km southwest CONSEQUENCE — The outer boundary does not replace checking core, buffer and transition zoning with the Land authority. CLEAR · National natural monument · nearest published extent — 216.2 km southeast CONSEQUENCE — Nationwide designation screen; protection provisions and the exact boundary must be checked in the applicable designation instrument. CLEAR · Register image — BfN Nationalparke CONSEQUENCE — BfN geoservice, not an on-site survey. The map draws the nearest designation (National park) in a frame of about 96.0 km. ACTION · Evidence limit — No zoning and no individual provision from the applicable protection instrument. NEXT ACTION — Every designation on this page lies more than 25 km from the parcel. No condition and no request follow for the purchase. https://grund-check.de 101 / 197 Parcel — Gemarkung 1041, Flur 2, Flurstück 16/24